How to Identify Premises, Conclusions on the LSAT
Categories: US Education News
The LSAT includes three main sections: logical reasoning, reading comprehension and analytical reasoning. Each of these sections relies on specific skills or strategies. For example, the analytical reasoning section requires you to know how to set up a logic game.And to do well on the analytical reasoning section, you’ll also need to understand common questions the LSAT asks about logic games, as well as advanced tactics tailored to specific logic game scenarios.On the other hand, some skills are useful across multiple sections. One of the most fundamental skills LSAT takers need to master is how to divide an argument into premises and conclusions. How to Identify Premises and Conclusions A logical argument is a series of claims that make a point. A conclusion is the point an argument is making, and the premises are claims that support that point.There are two main ways to find a conclusion to an argument. The simplest is to look for indicator words. Words that indicate a premise include "because," "since" and "for." Words that indicate a conclusion include "therefore," "thus" and "consequently."However, some words and phrases can indicate either a premise or a conclusion depending on the context, like "but," "although," "yet," "however," "nevertheless" and "after all."Some premises and conclusions don’t start with an indicator word at all. Writing would be clunky and repetitive if writers had to signal every point they made. Instead, indicator words are used judiciously to add clarity or emphasis. Using Premises and Conclusions Knowledge on the LSAT The LSAT may ask you to do a range of things with an argument in both the logical reasoning and reading comprehension sections. You may have to strengthen, weaken or find hidden assumptions or flaws in an argument; compare the argument to other arguments; or explain how the argument works.Now, imagine an LSAT question that asked you for an assumption that the argument depends upon. In this case, you need to find an unstated premise that connects the other premise to the conclusion: Law school applicants can learn a lot from one of the best blogs about law school admissions. If an argument in the logical reasoning section seems to lack a conclusion, don’t panic. The question may ask you to draw your own conclusion by asking “what must be true” based on the prompt.Learning to spot premises and conclusions on logical reasoning questions quickly and flawlessly is one of the best things you can do to boost your LSAT score in a short time. While tricky at first, with focused and rigorous practice, it will become second nature.