The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada solved paper Section 17
Categories: PEBC Exam Canada
The Pharmacy Examining Board of Canada solved paper Section 17
Pharmacist Qualifying Examination - Part I (MCQ) - Sample Questions with answers in block letter
Capability 6: Information and Exploration Application
1-Which of the accompanying could be the most helpful reference to realize what mix of antiretroviral specialists is at present prescribed as a first-line treatment to treat HIV contamination?
- Meta-examinations
- A randomized, controlled preliminary
- Clinical practice rules
- Abridgment of Drugs and Strengths (CPS Medication Data)
2-Type II measurable blunder in a review contrasting two medication treatment regimens happens when:
- the control drug is definitely not a "best quality level" treatment.
- a genuinely massive contrast exists yet the thing that matters isn't clinically significant.
- the populace being scrutinized doesn't address the populace with the illness.
- the information shows no distinction between two treatment regimens and a distinction really exists.
3-An enough fueled, randomized controlled preliminary led more than two years showed that the essential result (a serious cardiovascular occasion) happened in 15% of the patients who got the new medication, though the essential result happened in 25% of the patients who got a fake treatment. The general gamble decrease accomplished with the new medication is:
- 10%
- 15%
- 25%
- 40%
4-In a sufficiently fueled, randomized controlled preliminary led more than three years, a particular serious secondary effect (i.e., decrease in leukocytes) with traditional treatment is seen in 0.5% of the review test. In patients who get a newfound medication, just 0.45% experience a similar secondary effect. In light of these outcomes, the base number of patients that would have to get the new medication for a very long time to measurably show the counteraction of one episode of this secondary effect in something like one patient (i.e., NNT) is:
- 20
- 150
- 200
- 2000
5-A drug specialist has gotten data with respect to another medication to treat hypertension. The data depends on a two-month, fake treatment controlled, randomized investigation of 1000 grown-ups that showed a critical typical diminishing in systolic tension from 160 mm Hg to 141 mm Hg and diastolic strain from 98 mm Hg to 86 mm Hg. The most well-known unfriendly responses were stomach upset and discombobulation. Which of coming up next is the main constraint of this review?
- The review size was excessively little to enough survey benefits.
- The patients didn't accomplish rule focuses for hypertension.
- Brought down circulatory strain is a proxy result.
- Long haul security and adequacy were not evaluated.